top of page

Fake Catholique Nationale post

  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 2 min read

Recently, Prots and Eo’s have resuscitated this already debunked topic.

They believe the fake article says “the Pope is God on earth”

  1. No one denies catholique nationale was a real and mostly reliable newsletter

  2. Regardless of it being mostly reliable, it can still err or produce mistranslations etc.

Now, I'll translate the article,

“The patriarch of Venise recently signed in these terms the transubstantiation not of the Pope in Jesus Christ, but of Jesus Christ in the Pope. Jesus Christ is transubstantiated in the Pope, he became the pope; to hear his words, it suffices to hear those of the Pope. Hear: “The Pope is not only the vicar of Jesus Christ but is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under the veil of the chair. Does the Pope speak? It’s Jesus Christ that is speaking. Does the pope grant a pardon or pronounce an anathema or that he grant grace? So that when the pope speaks there isn't a need to examine but to obey; we are not to criticize his decisions nor speak about his precepts. Consequently, anyone wearing the crown must be subject to it by divine law.”

Some people think this is attributed to John Paul 2, and those who say this prove themselves to be analphabetic as it says in this same forged article that its the patriarch of venise that is speaking and not John Paul 2..

The accurately translated document goes like this:“The Pope REPRESENTS Jesus Christ Himself and therefore is a loving father. The life of the Pope is a holocaust of love for the human family. His word is love; love, his weapon; love, the answer he gives to all who hate him; love, his flag, that is, the Cross, which signed the greatest triumph on Earth and in Heaven.”Frs. Leslie Rumble, Charles M. Carty, volume 2, Radio Replies

The false quote above is a falsified protestant mistranslation and Pius XII was accused of this not JP2.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Molina between Fideism and Theological Inversion

Having presented, very schematically, Molina’s doctrine and — as a necessary counterpoint — that of Báñez, let us now justify in what sense we can maintain that Molina, contrary to Báñez, moves in rat

 
 
 
ON FALSE REALISM

The diverse forms of Realism. Those who held that universals actually exist in the nature of things divided into different opinions. Plato1, since he denied that true science can be given of singulars

 
 
 
SYSTEMS THAT DENY ALL REALITY TO UNIVERSALS

The opinions are set forth. With the notion of universals established, there arises the notable question of whether universals have some objective value — that is, whether any entity or nature corresp

 
 
 

Comments


About Me

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It’s easy. Just click “Edit Text” or double click me to add your own content and make changes to the font. I’m a great place for you to tell a story and let your users know a little more about you.

#LeapofFaith

Posts Archive

Keep Your Friends
Close & My Posts Closer.

Socials
Join my server for more pdfs, notes, and intellectuals. 

  • Discord
  • Instagram
  • X
  • TikTok
  • Twitch
  • Youtube

© 2035 by by Leap of Faith. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page